Wys tans plasings met die etiket stukkend. Wys alle plasings
Wys tans plasings met die etiket stukkend. Wys alle plasings

2009-10-20

Broken/Stukkend 4 : receiving e-mail from customers

Picture by Wikimedia user Bidgee
A friend's frustrating attempts at correspondence with Telstra, Australia's lumbering telecoms giant, has galvanised me to reprise my occasional series about customer service. He has been finding it impossible to get any reaction from Telstra about his serious billing problem by e-mail and his calls to their “customer service” numbers are simply terminating in Tagalog or Cantonese voicemail promts. The e-mail channel consists of a web-based form that allows the customer to enter 200 characters ‒ hardly sufficient for describing a real complaint.

I myself have recently had Standard Bank, “a leader in banking technology in South Africa” which is busy “ensuring the highest standards of professionalism, integrity, and fairness” ask me to resend a 18-month old message to which they had assigned the reference number 1955721, since although they have not yet replied to it, they reportedly no longer have it. If anyone from Standard Bank is reading this and cares to refute the alleged loss of the message, please post a comment below.

Why are many companies so terribly bad at replying to e-mail? My conjecture is that the inappropriate pricing model (free at the point of delivery) of e-mail is partly to blame. Postal mail and a telephone call to a service center both require the supplicant to invest time and money in lodging the enquiry. Of course, an e-mail also requires time but not as much as holding for 30 minutes for the call centre. With telephonic customer service, any unmatched demand for service simply disappears as customers hang up when they are tired of waiting. E-mailed enquiries pile up, and much faster than postal mail. Why not automatically return unhandled queries or unopened e-mail messages, flagged appropriately, to the sender after a week (say) has expired?

To my surprise, I have recently had the South African Post Office reply to a message within 48 hours. The Hong Kong Post Office took a week to respond to a similar query. Kudos to the SAPO for this! On the other hand, I am still waiting for a reply to my e-mail of 20 September to CustomerCare@virginmobile.co.za and have all but lost hope. I am reminded of a remark by Niels Kjellerup of the Call Centre Manager's Forum in a recent BNet podcast:
“outsourcing [of call centres] is only for those businesses who don’t care about customers.”
He went on to explain that these are typically businesses which have customers tied up in a contract and really do not need to provide anything resembling reasonable service. I tend to agree.

Earlier posts in this series

Broken/Stukkend 1 : in QLD's “captial” city
Broken/Stukkend 2 : DSTV se rekeninge-afdeling
Broken/Stukkend 3 : SARS eFiling's e-mail

2009-06-21

Broken/Stukkend 2 : DSTV se rekeninge-afdeling

DSTV is die Telkom van betaaltelevisie - 'n monopolie wat deur die Suid-Afrikaanse owerhede (in beide gevale, OKOSA/ICASA) in 'n skoon kombers toegedraai en warm gehou word terwyl die verbruiker steun en kreun. Ek het al meer as tien jaar lank aaneenlopend 'n rekening by DSTV/Multichoice maar ontvang vanoggend 'n kort SMS waarin ek ingelig word dat my rekening agterstallig is en ek 'n R50-herkonneksiefooi moet oorbetaal. Ná tien minute se versigtige rondblaai deur my bankstate, kom ek agter dat daar vroeg in Mei laas 'n betaling af is. Gaaf, dan nou maar na DSTV se webwerf toe om hulle telefoonnommer te kry. Op dié werf lees dat kredietkaartbetalings sedert Mei nie meer aanvaar word nie.



'n Verdere tien of vyftien minute se aanhou op die inbellyn, en ek praat met 'n simpatieke dame wat my vermoede bevestig en aanbied om die diens onmiddelik (daarmee ís hulle goed) te heraktiveer en my bankrekeningbesonderhede te neem vir 'n maandelikse debiet. Sy verstaan my probleem en bevestig dat DSTV wel my eksakte e-posbesonderhede en selfoonnommer het. Hulle beweer dat ek 'n brief per pos in dié verband moes ontvang het. Waarom nie maar ook 'n e-pos of 'n SMS om te waarsku nie? Het hulle mooi gedink en besluit die R50-herkonneksiefooi is meer werd as die intekenaars wat hulle gaan verloor?

Was DSTV nie die enigste opsie in SA vir TV anders as die grusame SAUK s'n nie, het ek sonder twyfel die DSTV gekanselleer. Trouens, dit word net deur my ouers gebruik en ons DSTV het ek lankal kanselleer omdat hulle so duur en hopeloos is. Hulle het hier weer die eerste reël van kleinhandel verbreek - om te weier om 'n klant se geld die aanvaar indien dié klant gereed staan om die geld te gee. Ek hoop daar is baie mense wat hulle DSTV-intekening 'n stille dood laat sterf. Ek is taamlik seker dat DSTV, soos Virgin Active, nie maandelikse state (per e-pos) stuur nie, want hulle wil nie slapende honde wakkermaak nie. Is dit nie tyd dat die bemoeisieke owerhede diensverskaffers dwing om, indien hulle meer as - sê maar - R100 van 'n verbruiker te verhaal, die verbruiker die reg gee om 'n maandelikse staat (per e-pos of MMS) te eis, nie?